It seems that us Fuji users can’t comment on the Z-fc without being dismissed as biased and irrelevant. Unless you've had 10 different samples of the exact same lens, i consider your post about sample variation simply fake news. DX/APS-C, every system does serve a purpose - something you don't get. I guess you haven't seen the vid above, nevermind. That is being better build than any digital which is being after some few, or couple years unlike Leica only a fraction being worth of it's new price. Only by a Film Rangefinder M-Series Leica, but these are simply out of my league. I have two FF systems from Canon & Sony, but none gives me the same kind of feeling, like Fujifilm.Īnd speaken of manual focus lenses - the joys my old SLRs & Rangefinders are giving me, can't being replaced with any modern, digital whatever, from haptics & feeling, emotional PoV. I prefer the classic approach with direct dials & knobs, buttons from the X-System over anything. Gear are just tools, to get the job done, all right? Horses for courses, let the church into the village, you've never seen this, from a pro landscape photographer, after 6 years: I am using Fujifilm X since late 2012 with the X-E1, so i do have >9.5 years usage, experience with the System. And Nikons best lenses costing a ton, and weighting a ton (in terms of long focal lengths - or high-end zooms, too) Last, but not least, the Fujinon does feature weathersealing. The Z50/Zfc does lack a ton of DX Lenses, bc of that, i switched after D70-D7000. II iteration does feature an aperture ring, which the Nikkor doesn't have - despite the Zfc being a "vintage" modeled DSLM after the FM/FE(2) design. 3rd, the 27/2.8, whileas not being cheap, is an extraordinary performer, and the new Mk. Second, the 28/2.8 Nikkor is a fine lens, albeit very plasticky, even the Lens mount.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |